5 Challenges of Implementing QbD in Biologics: Opportunity?

As of  October 2013, not one biologic product (large molecules) has succeeded with a full Quality-by-Design (QbD) regulatory filing. Compared to the success of small molecules, what are the specific challenges for Biologics or BioPharmaceuticals?

Based on interviews from the industry, below is a summary of the challenges biologics manufacturers are facing when implementing Quality-by-Design (QbD):

  1. Complexity and heterogeneity of biologics. Science of biology is still evolving. Hence, difficulty in understanding CQA’s, CPP’s and their relationships.

  2. Unclear guidance from Regulatory Agencies (FDA, EMA, etc.) on process consistency and clinical performance

  3. Difficulty in predicting Scale-up models and technology transfers to commercial lines

  4. Misaligned (or siloed) values within organizations: R&D must invest initially but Manufacturing will mainly reap benefits.

  5. Lack of experience in characterizing Design Space and Multivariate Analysis

The distinctive challenge stems from the properties of large molecules derived from biological organisms. The table below lists some differences between small molecule drugs (chemically synthesized) and biologics (ii.e. therapeutic proteins and monoclonal antibodies).

Small Molecule Drugs

Biologics

Process/Product Characterization

Subject to less variation, based on physical science

Subject to high variation due to nature of cells

Biomarker

Commonly identified

Depends on indication

CQA’s & CPP’s

Generic list

May be product specific

Number or CQA’s & CPP’s

Low

Medium

Scale Models

Reliable

Less Reliable

Process Variability

Low

High

Analytical Variability (i.e potency, impurity)

Low

Medium to High

Process Monitoring Capability

High

Low to Medium

Process Validation Steps

Few key steps

All steps

Stability

Stable

Sensitive to Environment

Immunogenicity

Mostly non-immunogenic

Immunogenic

So should we give up on QbD in Biologics? What should our QbD strategy be in biologics?

Have you noticed that the differences are mainly related to the cell culture development process. Cells are living organisms and have much variability. However this should not hinder us from applying the scientific method. Humans (trillions of cells) are far more complex, yet the field of social sciences has been applying the scientific method. As scientists, we have to overcome the initial mental barrier that we imposed on ourselves.

In the meantime, we can begin our QbD journey from downstream (isolation, purification, etc.) and formulation processes, where there is less variability (or less excuses). Over time, Upstream will have to work with downstream to be an integral part of the process.

What are your thoughts? Please feel free to share.

Get New QbD Tips!
I agree to have my personal information transfered to AWeber ( more information )
Want More Tips from QbD Practitioners? Then join our newsletter!
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.
One Comment